Capitalization weighted indices
In a capitalization-weighted index, each component stock contributes its market value to determine the overall index value and, therefore, stocks with greater market value are given more weight in this type of index. The market value of each stock can be calculated by multiplying the stock price with the total number of shares outstanding. The sum of the market value of all the component stocks is then divided by a divisor to obtain the final index value. This divisor is an arbitrary number that is first defined when the index is first published.
Capitalization-Weighted Index
Most, if not all, of the commonly used stock markets today are measured by market capitalization-weighted indexes. Many believe these indexes represent the best way of measuring how a market performs. In fact, market cap-weighted indexes have dominated the assessment of equity market performance over the past 30 to 40 years, as they are seen as representing the true measure of equity market return.
Market capitalization-weighted indexes clearly have some advantages. Theoretically, they represent an appropriate broad market benchmark against which to compare the performance of active managers. Also, market cap-weighted indexes are easy and cheap to track. The question then is: Can these three drawbacks be addressed by reshaping index benchmarks or passive management approaches?
Backward or forward-looking bias The backward-looking bias is a difficult problem to overcome given that share prices are generally regarded as discounting future growth prospects. So, unless we have sufficient foresight or the ability to predict which sectors or shares will grow quicker or for longer than the market expects, it is going to be tough to address the backward-looking bias of indexes.
However, even without accurate forecasting, over the long term both emerging markets and smaller companies should deliver higher earnings growth than developed market large-cap companies. Therefore, strategic over-allocations to these two areas mindful of not overpaying at the outset will tilt a portfolio to higher future returns, noting the associated risks. Concentration of risk and diversification There are both simple and complex methodologies for constructing more diversified portfolios than market cap-weighted indexes.
The development of global equity portfolios on a fixed regional weight basis was a response to the excessive concentration of risk that had arisen in Japan at the end of the s. Capped indexes e. Both the fixed weight and capped index approaches have proved successful, delivering modestly better returns per unit of risk over the period of their existence. Taking the diversification approach to an extreme would be to create an index that is equally weighted in all the constituent shares.
In terms of diversification of stock-specific risk, this is effective since each company will have the same weight as every other company and therefore there will be negligible concentration of risk at a company level.
However, if this approach is considered in more detail, some disadvantages emerge. For one, it would not be investable on a large scale because investors could not acquire as much of small companies as they could of large companies. Secondly, there would be considerable concentrations of risk at a sector level: a sector made up of a large number of small companies would have a much bigger allocation than a sector made up of a small number of very large companies.
If equal-weighted indexes are not a realistic alternative to market cap-weighted indexes, there are other, more sophisticated, diversification-based approaches that can be applied. At its simplest, the theory is that an investor wants to gain exposure to all parts of the market while seeking to avoid concentration of risk.
Notwithstanding these difficulties, there are now a number of products on the market that represent effective ways of constructing diversified portfolios and reducing risk concentrations. The sophistication of these approaches, including the skill of the manager in designing the portfolio construction process and the optimizations behind it, inclines us to regard these more as active management strategies than index-tracking or passive management. Avoidance of asset price bubbles The avoidance of asset price bubbles appears more straightforward.
Market capitalization-weighted indexes are based on the value of a company being its number of shares multiplied by the price of those shares. The simple answer may be to construct an index of shares that does not use the market price of those shares as one of its inputs. GDP-weighted indexes offer this type of value-weighted index. While the relative GDP weights of countries are highly stable, and this approach has merit, it is a blunt instrument that fails to take account of the increasing globalization of markets and fails to recognize that domestic stock markets are decreasingly representative of the national economy.
A more sophisticated approach to value-weighting is to construct an index in which each company is sized according to its economic or fundamental value rather than a value driven by its share price. Companies could be sized in the index according to any number of different variables representing the economic scale or value of the business, such as profits, earnings, dividends, cash flow, employment, etc. This approach is appealing.
First, it is reasonably straightforward to construct an index based on a small number of parameters, and this index will be highly investable since large companies as measured by economic value generally exhibit large market capitalizations. Second, the investor sees that the investment is linked to the underlying growth of the business in which they are invested and is not driven by the vagaries of market sentiment.
Over time, such a value-weighted index combined with sensible rebalancing might be expected to deliver returns that are superior to the capitalization-weighted index because it will avoid the value-destroying effects of a high exposure to asset price bubbles. The performance of value-weighted indexes would therefore have lagged the market cap-weighted index on the way up, but significantly outperformed later on.
As investors are now acutely aware, the equity market can suffer a broad-based sell-off in the absence of a bubble in any given part of the market. However, the exposure to the value style varies over time as a function of how far the market price has moved away from intrinsic value as measured by the value weight and has over some periods resulted is being overweight to stocks and sectors that may be regarded as growth stocks.
The value bias relative to a market cap-weighted index is not of itself a negative. Fama and French have demonstrated that value investing as a style was expected to deliver excess returns over long periods.
But the value-bias relative to a market cap-weighted approach does mean that the value-weighted approach may produce a materially different pattern of returns from the market cap-weighted index i. However, many investors should find this caveat to be acceptable; what we are trying to do with the value-weighted index is, over the long term, capture the equity market beta return in a way that mitigates the well-known flaws of the market cap-weighted index.
Conclusion While market cap-weighted indexes have material flaws, there are ways in which these flaws can be addressed.
A well-diversified, actively managed equity portfolio is one approach. However, not all investors have the desire or capacity to put such a program in place. Alternative indexation approaches, including value-weighted indexes, are cost effective and simple ways investors can capture the equity market return while mitigating some of the flaws of market cap-weighted indexes. Have your say on this topic! Comments that are thought to be disrespectful or offensive may be removed by our Benefits Canada admins.
Our Conferences Workplace Benefits Awards. Home Investments Other. Print Email Comment Share:. Originally published on benefitscanada. Join us on Twitter BenCanMag. Add a comment Have your say on this topic! Field required. Newsletter registration Attend our conferences Magazine archives Directory archives Polls. Privacy Terms of Use All rights reserved. Groupe Contex Inc.
The Capitalization-Weighted Index (cap-weighted index, CWI) is a type of stock market index in which each component of the index is weighted relative to its. However, the main risk that comes with market-capitalization weighted index tracking is worth noting. The risk is that if a stock, sector or even.
A capitalization-weighted index is a type of market index with individual components, or securities, weighted according to their total market capitalization. Market capitalization uses the total market value of a firm's outstanding shares. The calculation multiples outstand shares by the current price of a single share. Outstanding shares are those owned by individual shareholders, institutional block holdings, and company insider holdings.
However, these indexes use either the Emerging Markets or the Frontier Markets methodological criteria concerning size and liquidity. Our market cap weighted indexes are among the most respected and widely used benchmarks in the financial industry.
A capitalization-weighted or "cap-weighted" index , also called a market-value-weighted index is a stock market index whose components are weighted according to the total market value of their outstanding shares. Every day an individual stock's price changes and thereby changes a stock index's value.
Value-Weighted Index: Definition, Calculation & Examples
Many Exchange Traded Funds ETFs use indexes as their underlying benchmarks, so it is equally important to understand the different types of indexes. Your ETF investing strategy depends on them. The three main types of indexes are price-weighted, value-weighted, and pure unweighted. With a price-weighted index, the index trading price is based on the trading prices of the individual securities stocks that comprise the index basket known as components. In other words, the stocks with the higher prices will have more impact on the movement of the index than stocks with lower prices, since their price is "weighted" higher.
Market Cap Weighted Index: Benefits And Pitfalls
Most, if not all, of the commonly used stock markets today are measured by market capitalization-weighted indexes. Many believe these indexes represent the best way of measuring how a market performs. In fact, market cap-weighted indexes have dominated the assessment of equity market performance over the past 30 to 40 years, as they are seen as representing the true measure of equity market return. Market capitalization-weighted indexes clearly have some advantages. Theoretically, they represent an appropriate broad market benchmark against which to compare the performance of active managers. Also, market cap-weighted indexes are easy and cheap to track. The question then is: Can these three drawbacks be addressed by reshaping index benchmarks or passive management approaches? Backward or forward-looking bias The backward-looking bias is a difficult problem to overcome given that share prices are generally regarded as discounting future growth prospects. So, unless we have sufficient foresight or the ability to predict which sectors or shares will grow quicker or for longer than the market expects, it is going to be tough to address the backward-looking bias of indexes.
Capitalization-weighted Index also called cap-weighted or value-weighted index is a capital market index in which the constituent securities are weighted based on their market capitalization , which equals the product of its price per share and total number of common shares outstanding. The weight of each security is calculated by the ratio of its market capitalization to the sum of market capitalization of all constituent securities.
Indexes constructed to measure the characteristics and performance of specific markets or asset classes are typically market cap-weighted, meaning the index constituents are weighted according to the total market cap or market value of their available outstanding shares. In other words, the company with the largest market cap will represent the largest weight in the index, meaning mega cap companies like Apple will impact the performance of the overall index more than a small cap company will.
How are indexes weighted?
Index funds are the most popular investment product used today. Most of those funds are based on a market cap weighted index. But do you know how market cap weighting works? Or how it affects your portfolio? It pays to know how the index works, so you understand how the fund and your money is invested. A market cap weighted index uses, you guesses it, market cap to build the index. Market cap is the stock price multiplied by the total number of outstanding shares. In a cap weighted index, the stock with the largest market cap gets the highest weighting in the index. The second largest gets the second highest weighting and so on, down to the smallest market cap stock. Usually, liquidity or float the number of publicly owned shares available for trading is a factor in the formula. The reason is simple. This benefits the funds by taking into consideration the number of publicly available shares, since index funds buy shares of stock in the index. Large cap companies have a bigger impact on any economy.
Overcoming the flaws of a market capitalization-weighted index
As a member, you'll also get unlimited access to over 79, lessons in math, English, science, history, and more. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you succeed. Already registered? Log in here for access. Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course. Log in or Sign up. Veteran Business and Economics teacher at a number of community colleges and in the for profit sector. Ike is a securities analyst for a brokerage firm. He has created a small index for a few local companies called the Ike Index.
