Walter investment management docket

Walter investment management docket

Exhibit T3E. In re:. Chapter 11 Voluntary. This Disclosure Statement is distributed to you as part of a prepetition solicitation of your vote on a prepackaged plan of reorganization.

Clayborn v. Walter Investment Management Corp, Ditech

Prime Clerk collects your email for the sole purpose of sending you updates on the docket activity for the case you select at the frequency and for the duration that you designate. Garrity Jr. First Day Motions. First Day Orders. On January 18, , the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Plan.

Notice of Effective Date. Plan and Disclosure Statement. Ray C. Schrock, P. Matthew S. Barr Sunny Singh. Brian Masumoto Shannon Scott. Repeats Daily Weekly Monthly. Repeat Every 1 2 3 4 5 Days Weeks Months. Repeat By day of the month. Starts On. Time every half-hour.

Ends Never After Occurrences On. Recipients e. Log In. Your username or password is incorrect. Please try again or contact your case team to reset your password. Old Password Enter your old password. New Password Minimum of 6 characters. Re-enter Password Password must match previously entered new password. Change Password. Case Navigation. Case Info Docket Claims. Quick Links. Add to Calendar. December 4 p. December 21 a. January 8 p. January 12 a. ET filed by Sunny Singh on behalf of W January 17 p.

March 29 p. Garritty, Jr. Info Center. Case Number Petition Date November 30,

Advanced Search. Docket number(s) (e.g. 1,3,). Docket text. Walter Investment Management Corp. as debtor and debtor in possession in the The Bankruptcy Court takes judicial notice of the docket of the Chapter

Register here to receive weekly email notices about recently-filed securities class action complaints and news in the area of securities class action litigation. Processing your request please wait Close Search.

Prime Clerk collects your email for the sole purpose of sending you updates on the docket activity for the case you select at the frequency and for the duration that you designate.

This case was filed in U. District Courts, Florida Southern District.

Status Here

Sign In Register. Docket alerts are an advanced feature of CourtListener. Monthly donors can create unlimited docket alerts. If you are not a monthly donor, we allow five alerts and give a bonus of 10 alerts to anybody with the RECAP Extension installed. You currently have alerts.

Ditech files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for second time in 14 months

And that relationship can grow over time. The decision was more than just a victory for the company's term loan lenders: it was a much-needed warning signal to the restructuring industry. First, a quick synopsis of the opinion. In short, Judge Sontchi sustained most, but not all, of the term lenders objections on the basis that the Debtors' i deployed unrealistic rig utilization and day rate assumptions and ii failed to take into consideration macro considerations that would affect the Debtors' eventual ability to refinance debt upon maturity in if they didn't run out of cash before then. Putting aside the specifics of this case, the decision is important for another reason: it highlights the importance of feasibility. Now, granted, the term lenders had to object for Sontchi to arrive at his conclusion in Paragon but there is an increasing likelihood of Judges scrutinizing feasibility. Maybe we need Judges to be activists and save us from ourselves. Deals are being cut, sure, but are they for the right reasons? Are they cut to ensure the viability of the companies underneath capital structures or to uphold "castles in the air" theory and line the pockets of distressed investors?

Exhibit 2. Walter Investment Management Corp.

Beck v. Walter Investment Management Corp. et al

Related publications
Яндекс.Метрика